Starmer to ban drinking in pubs – and other radical Labour laws that might head our way
Only last week, I was sitting in a pub garden when a complete stranger wilfully lit a cigarette just yards away from me.
I literally saw the man put the cigarette to his lips and inhale. My distress at this infringement of my human rights can only be imagined.
So I was thrilled to learn that new PM Keir Starmer is planning a total ban on smoking outdoors. Now he's made a start, there's a lot more the Labour government should do.
On going to the bar I was horrified to find the pub was full of people openly drinking alcohol. I found it very triggering.
Alcohol is known to cause arguments and violence, possibly even more than smoking. Starmer needs to make pubs safe spaces for everyone and BAN drinking beer, wine and spirits in them.
Labour justified the outdoors smoking ban by saying it would ease the strain on the NHS. By that logic, there’s a much stronger case for banning drinking.
Smoking costs the NHS £2.5billion a year. Alcohol costs it £3.5billion. The total cost to society is £21billion.
Pub drinking has to stop. Now.
Starmer must go further. Everyone agrees that NHS waiting lists are far too long. There's an obvious solution, as put forward by Labour MP Jess Phillips.
Phillips suggested she recently got preferential hospital treatment because she backed a Gaza ceasefire in a crunch Commons vote.
This helped speed up her care when a Palestinian doctor treated her during a visit to a Birmingham hospital.
Don't miss...
Pub garden smoking ban 'could trigger arguments and violence' [LATEST]
Jeremy Clarkson details worst day of his life as he slams Starmer's smoking ban [INSIGHT]
Loose Women sparks fury with Angela Rayner remarks as fans slam panel [REVEAL]
This innovative secondary care triage system must be extended.
Every NHS patient should be questioned on their political views, and those who give wrong answers on issues such as the Middle East and trans rights should be denied care.
That would slash waiting lists to just a few hundred thousand overnight.
Let's call it the "Phillips principal". Once it has been set, it will have endless uses.
Instead of basing state pension entitlement on national insurance contributions, it should be calculated according to how many left-wing protest marches retirees attended during their working lifetime.
Somebody who has been on, say, 35 qualifying marches would get the full state pension. Less than 10 and they wouldn't get a penny.
So few people would claim the state pension that even the incompetent Department for Work and Pensions might be able to administrate it.
Many are worried about the autumn Budget on October 30, where Reeves is expected to increase tax on capital gains, but that's not enough. Instead, she should ban capital gains altogether.
Don't miss...
Labour declares war on savers with triple pension tax raid and plot to cut Isas [LATEST]
Labour's war on wealth won't touch the rich - ordinary taxpayers will pay [INSIGHT]
Eight things Starmer is hiding about UK economy to justify Budget smash and grab [REVEAL]
Entrepreneurs, investors and landlords can't expect to continue making money under a Labour government.
Making capital gains for your own personal use is a micro-aggression that demeans and marginalises anybody who can't be bothered to do it themselves.
It has to stop.
By the same token, Labour should ban inheritances. And it MUST axe private sector pensions, with the savings directed towards the public sector whose pensions are only about five times bigger which isn't enough.
Over time, Starmer should ban the private sector altogether. As a self-proclaimed socialist, he'd be a hypocrite not to.
These far-sighted policies would close chancellor Rachel Reeves' £22billion black hole with enough left over to give the rail unions a pay rise every week.
There are plenty more things Labour should ban, but I should probably stop. Starmer might actually take some of these ideas seriously.
