MPs set for crunch debate on 'English votes for English laws' as SNP slams proposals
MPS are set for a crunch debate on the Government's proposals to introduce so-called English votes for English laws (Evel).
MPs will today debate plans for English votes for English laws
The Government has tabled an updated set of Evel plans which it argues will "strengthen the Union" – but the SNP has branded the proposals a "dog's breakfast".
Commons Leader Chris Grayling said: "Today we are delivering our commitment to introduce English votes for English laws.
"We are determined to strengthen the Union – we are devolving more powers across the United Kingdom, and now is the time to give the English more say over their own destiny."
He added that the plans ensure that Westminster governs "in the best interests of those living within the Union".
The controversial plans would see the introduction of a new parliamentary stage for laws that do not affect other parts of the UK.
English or English and Welsh MPs would scrutinise such legislation alone and then accept or veto it.
All MPs would then continue to debate and vote on the legislation at second reading, third reading and report stage.
Ministers have argued the system is the best way to address the so-called West Lothian Question as devolution progresses.
Chris Grayling, leader of the House of Commons
The SNP will vote against the proposals
But the SNP has vowed to vote against the Conservatives' plans – while Labour has suggested the reforms would create two tiers of MPs.
Pete Wishart, SNP shadow leader of the House, branded the proposals "a dog's breakfast that will prove to be unworkable in the long run".
He added: "Outside the ranks of the Conservative party the Leader of the House has managed to convince absolutely no-one over the quality of his plans.
"All other political parties are opposed to them, all the devolved assemblies and Parliaments are resolutely against.
"Even the unelected House of Lords and the Tory dominated Procedure Committee have a range of issues and concerns.
"The lack of consensus on such a huge constitutional change should be enough for the Leader of the House to think again."
Labour claims the reforms would create two tiers of MPs